Mythological Monsters: Part III – The Loch Ness Monster
Let’s stay in the water shall we? But this time you might actually know the beast. Far from the half-monk persona of the Bishopfish, the Loch Ness monster is more like part snake, part dinosaur! His nickname, Nessie, comes from the Scottish Gaelic: Niseag, but we don’t really know a lot about it – what he eats is a mystery, (probably humans), as are his exact size and his general habits – but this can perhaps be attributed to the fact that Nessie is a myth, and it is therefore less likely that any scientific study of the beast will turn up significant results.
Why pick Nessie for my post when almost everyone knows about it? Well, this might be one of my favourite monsters because, whilst all the others are definitely dead or difficult to believe in, with Nessie there is always a little part of you wondering. This legend has managed to mess with a lot of peoples’ heads over the last few centuries. Even today, if you head for the banks of Loch Ness and take a look in the dark depths of the lake, you’d probably think, “this creature might just be down there”. Though, some people would say, that if such a monster exists he would probably be slightly bored, given that he has been in the same lake for more than four centuries . . .
Yes these are the kind of thoughts that cross my mind when I loose myself in the deep blue carpet of the lake. Well don’t laugh I am not the only one.
The first account of the Loch Ness monster comes from the seventh-century Life of Saint Columba. It depicts the story of a monk who came across a funeral being conducted near the Loch Ness. The deceased had been innocently taking a swim, when a “water beast” decided to go for the unfortunate man, and took a bite. The villagers could only drag his corpse to the shore. But when the monk ordered someone to swim the Loch Ness and fetch his boat, he prevented a repeat attack by making the sign of the cross and, essentially, telling the beast to go away.
But it was more obviously brought to the world’s attention in 1933 by Alex Campbell in an article in the Inverness Courier, where he mentioned, for the first time, a “monster” in the lake. Later that year George Spicer and his wife saw a “most extraordinary form of animal” in front of their car, and gave quite a precise description of it. Since then big N has had quite a success.
The most outstanding of his shining moments, is definitely when the first photograph of the Loch Ness monster – taken by Hugh Gray – was published, and the Secretary of State for Scotland actually ordered the police to prevent any attacks on it. In 1934 came the famous “surgeon’s photographs” showing a head and a neck emerging from the water . . . and then its equally famous denouncement as a hoax.
So, no genuine proof has emerged quite yet, but don’t despair and maybe, if some researcher put his mind to it, we might even find some big plesiosaur bones under there in a few years. As was said on the last monster post, I would rather go with the uncommon explanation.
Post by Astrid . . . . . . .

















